<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Wade Wallace&#8230;&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.situp-cycle.com/2010/01/21/dear-wade-wallace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2010/01/21/dear-wade-wallace/</link>
	<description>Sitting up straight; The key to growing urban cycling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:45:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2010/01/21/dear-wade-wallace/comment-page-1/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=998#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>Hope springs eternal Mike....
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cycling/blogs/cycling-tips/change-of-tune-20110817-1iwx4.html
Wade is man enough to admit when he is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope springs eternal Mike&#8230;.<br />
<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cycling/blogs/cycling-tips/change-of-tune-20110817-1iwx4.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cycling/blogs/cycling-tips/change-of-tune-20110817-1iwx4.html</a><br />
Wade is man enough to admit when he is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pedalpusher</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2010/01/21/dear-wade-wallace/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>pedalpusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=998#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Interesting viewpoint, insight and wisdom from an older (?) gentleman in regards to the vid: Guy from Cycle Chic.
(Yours, I already kinda know where Mikael stands)

Same with the Sinking of HMAS Adelaide. I know we toy with Nature at our peril, but didn&#039;t realize the potential effects to the shore.

Very refreshing and different. Thank You!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Interesting viewpoint, insight and wisdom from an older (?) gentleman in regards to the vid: Guy from Cycle Chic.<br />
(Yours, I already kinda know where Mikael stands)</p>
<p>Same with the Sinking of HMAS Adelaide. I know we toy with Nature at our peril, but didn&#8217;t realize the potential effects to the shore.</p>
<p>Very refreshing and different. Thank You!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rubbo</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2010/01/21/dear-wade-wallace/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rubbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=998#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Hi, Wade, you show yourself to be a very good sport to respond like this to my challenge.

I think you are wrong though, utility cycling will become very newsworthy. 

Our cites are being strangled  by cars. Europe has proved that a great burden can be lifted off cities by &lt;strong&gt;the humble bike&lt;/strong&gt;,  with benefits in public health at the same time.  Since transport stories are front page almost daily, it&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;a mystery to me &lt;/strong&gt;why the bike,  as an option,  is not getting proper consideration. It is everywhere else

The usual reason given is that conditions here &lt;strong&gt;are too different&lt;/strong&gt;  for us to emulate those European successes, and so they are not relevant.   We like to claim our distances are greater, for example.  &lt;strong&gt;David Hembrow,&lt;/strong&gt;  whose blog is linked here, and  who commutes 60 kms. a day by pedal power in Holland, proves  that&#039;s not true. 

 What holding us  back then? our climate is superior. Finding what the blockage is, physical, attitudinal, whatever,  is a huge story I would think.

Some say it&#039;s  the helmets we are forced to wear but which are a matter of choice  in Europe, that these  are  holding back utility cycling . 

If they&#039;ve crimped utility cycling, here,  that&#039;s not true of sports cycling. Racers and risk takers  love helmets and would wear them to the last competitor, optional or not . That&#039;s  an interesting story angle on the  perennial helmet debate,  I guess.  

Then,  there&#039;s  the story about &lt;strong&gt;Bike share&lt;/strong&gt;,  the street rental systems which are  sweeping the world. That&#039;s a big bike story and nothing to do with racing. 10,000 &lt;strong&gt;Bixies&lt;/strong&gt; are due on the streets of London any day now. 

They are coming to Melbourne too, or so they say. But will they?  can they? given our helmet laws. That&#039;s a  big story, I believe . It&#039;s  revenue and tourist story as well,  since these bike  share schemes bring visitors,  and they  spread the tourist dollar around like turbo charged garden sprinklers. Cities love them. Ask Montreal. 

Lastly, shall I put the cat amongst  the pigeons and suggest the really big story,  has to be  whether the dominant cycle culture, the one  you write about ,  &lt;strong&gt;bears some responsibility &lt;/strong&gt; for Australia  &lt;strong&gt;coming last&lt;/strong&gt;, or near to, in utility cycling, world wide. 

Why? How could it? Well,  all the experts agree that  to &lt;strong&gt;grow&lt;/strong&gt; utility bike use, &lt;strong&gt;you have to make  it safe and fun.&lt;/strong&gt; They  also  agree that  the way to do that,  is to have &lt;strong&gt;separate bike-ways&lt;/strong&gt; so that bikes and cars are kept separate and cyclists going to work  feel safe and happy. 

Such Bike-ways  cost big  money  and can&#039;t happen without  strong public pressure. There is little such pressure, here,  and the reason in part is  because the sport and leisure cycling lobby   &lt;strong&gt;don&#039;t care much about bike ways. &lt;/strong&gt;

They wont oppose them, but they don&#039;t particularly want them either.   The Lycra crowd    are  happy on the existing roads, either riding single file,  two abreast as the law allows,  or taking the whole road for special events.  They&#039;d like motorists to behave better for sure, but they are no about to quit the field because of road rage. 

They  have little interest in bike-ways into cites, sure to be clogged  with slower riders  and perhaps,  worse still, with pedestrians, all  in their way. Every ride is a training ride to some degree for the sports rider,  and that &lt;strong&gt;is better done on the road.&lt;/strong&gt;


The second reason why the dominant culture  impedes utility riding is that the machine you need for such riding ,  the bike of choice in the big bike transport countries, has been made something of a pariah here . I&#039;m talking the  stately sit up bike with rack, mudguards, lights enclosed chain, etc. 

This sort of bike is pretty much despised here, as a wimp machine, by serious riders, and bike shops actively discourage people from getting  them . Many complaints,   relayed to me by people who&#039;ve been steered away from these comfortable machines,  convinces me this is true, though they  are creeping in here and there, but on sufferance. When the stately sit-up is  the main bike on offer, filling shop windows, we will be getting  near to a utility bike culture 

Why sport cyclists feel threatened by these  bike, I have yet to find out. and i pan to do so in upcoming films. But right now , wade, no can deny they&#039;re  rare, nor  that they are the bike of choice in the big utility biking countries . 

 Thanks again, Wade, for being part of the debate. Mike Rubbo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Wade, you show yourself to be a very good sport to respond like this to my challenge.</p>
<p>I think you are wrong though, utility cycling will become very newsworthy. </p>
<p>Our cites are being strangled  by cars. Europe has proved that a great burden can be lifted off cities by <strong>the humble bike</strong>,  with benefits in public health at the same time.  Since transport stories are front page almost daily, it&#8217;s <strong>a mystery to me </strong>why the bike,  as an option,  is not getting proper consideration. It is everywhere else</p>
<p>The usual reason given is that conditions here <strong>are too different</strong>  for us to emulate those European successes, and so they are not relevant.   We like to claim our distances are greater, for example.  <strong>David Hembrow,</strong>  whose blog is linked here, and  who commutes 60 kms. a day by pedal power in Holland, proves  that&#8217;s not true. </p>
<p> What holding us  back then? our climate is superior. Finding what the blockage is, physical, attitudinal, whatever,  is a huge story I would think.</p>
<p>Some say it&#8217;s  the helmets we are forced to wear but which are a matter of choice  in Europe, that these  are  holding back utility cycling . </p>
<p>If they&#8217;ve crimped utility cycling, here,  that&#8217;s not true of sports cycling. Racers and risk takers  love helmets and would wear them to the last competitor, optional or not . That&#8217;s  an interesting story angle on the  perennial helmet debate,  I guess.  </p>
<p>Then,  there&#8217;s  the story about <strong>Bike share</strong>,  the street rental systems which are  sweeping the world. That&#8217;s a big bike story and nothing to do with racing. 10,000 <strong>Bixies</strong> are due on the streets of London any day now. </p>
<p>They are coming to Melbourne too, or so they say. But will they?  can they? given our helmet laws. That&#8217;s a  big story, I believe . It&#8217;s  revenue and tourist story as well,  since these bike  share schemes bring visitors,  and they  spread the tourist dollar around like turbo charged garden sprinklers. Cities love them. Ask Montreal. </p>
<p>Lastly, shall I put the cat amongst  the pigeons and suggest the really big story,  has to be  whether the dominant cycle culture, the one  you write about ,  <strong>bears some responsibility </strong> for Australia  <strong>coming last</strong>, or near to, in utility cycling, world wide. </p>
<p>Why? How could it? Well,  all the experts agree that  to <strong>grow</strong> utility bike use, <strong>you have to make  it safe and fun.</strong> They  also  agree that  the way to do that,  is to have <strong>separate bike-ways</strong> so that bikes and cars are kept separate and cyclists going to work  feel safe and happy. </p>
<p>Such Bike-ways  cost big  money  and can&#8217;t happen without  strong public pressure. There is little such pressure, here,  and the reason in part is  because the sport and leisure cycling lobby   <strong>don&#8217;t care much about bike ways. </strong></p>
<p>They wont oppose them, but they don&#8217;t particularly want them either.   The Lycra crowd    are  happy on the existing roads, either riding single file,  two abreast as the law allows,  or taking the whole road for special events.  They&#8217;d like motorists to behave better for sure, but they are no about to quit the field because of road rage. </p>
<p>They  have little interest in bike-ways into cites, sure to be clogged  with slower riders  and perhaps,  worse still, with pedestrians, all  in their way. Every ride is a training ride to some degree for the sports rider,  and that <strong>is better done on the road.</strong></p>
<p>The second reason why the dominant culture  impedes utility riding is that the machine you need for such riding ,  the bike of choice in the big bike transport countries, has been made something of a pariah here . I&#8217;m talking the  stately sit up bike with rack, mudguards, lights enclosed chain, etc. </p>
<p>This sort of bike is pretty much despised here, as a wimp machine, by serious riders, and bike shops actively discourage people from getting  them . Many complaints,   relayed to me by people who&#8217;ve been steered away from these comfortable machines,  convinces me this is true, though they  are creeping in here and there, but on sufferance. When the stately sit-up is  the main bike on offer, filling shop windows, we will be getting  near to a utility bike culture </p>
<p>Why sport cyclists feel threatened by these  bike, I have yet to find out. and i pan to do so in upcoming films. But right now , wade, no can deny they&#8217;re  rare, nor  that they are the bike of choice in the big utility biking countries . </p>
<p> Thanks again, Wade, for being part of the debate. Mike Rubbo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wade wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2010/01/21/dear-wade-wallace/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>wade wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=998#comment-309</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Thanks for taking the time to write this blog post.  I find it very interesting and you&#039;ve introduced me to a form of cycling that I never knew had such a passionate community.   It seems that any form of cyclist is very passionate about what they do.  You can&#039;t say that about many other sports!

The type of cycling that I&#039;m deeply involved in is quite different however.  I do use a bike to get to work, go to the store, go to a friend&#039;s place, etc.  But what would I write about that would interest people?  I&#039;m sure there&#039;s heaps, but my passion lays somewhere else and therefore I can only write about the cycling culture that I immerse myself in.

The reason newspapers only write about the lycra side of cycling is because it&#039;s newsworthy.  Lance Armstrong, the Tour de France, etc are of great interest to people, have lots of drama and excitement associated with it.  What would there be to consistently write about in terms of news and popular interest if there wasn&#039;t bike racing?  A story about my ride to work would not be a very good to read.  Just like my jog around the Botanical gardens is not newsworthy, the NY Marathon certainly is.  I understand that and I don&#039;t expect it to be any different.

You carry a very different view and I respect that.  I encourage you to share your passion with the thousands of other cyclists like yourself and do everything you can to nurture that niche.  You&#039;re very influential and I&#039;m certain you&#039;ll do very well.  

All my best!

Kind regards,
Wade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to write this blog post.  I find it very interesting and you&#8217;ve introduced me to a form of cycling that I never knew had such a passionate community.   It seems that any form of cyclist is very passionate about what they do.  You can&#8217;t say that about many other sports!</p>
<p>The type of cycling that I&#8217;m deeply involved in is quite different however.  I do use a bike to get to work, go to the store, go to a friend&#8217;s place, etc.  But what would I write about that would interest people?  I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s heaps, but my passion lays somewhere else and therefore I can only write about the cycling culture that I immerse myself in.</p>
<p>The reason newspapers only write about the lycra side of cycling is because it&#8217;s newsworthy.  Lance Armstrong, the Tour de France, etc are of great interest to people, have lots of drama and excitement associated with it.  What would there be to consistently write about in terms of news and popular interest if there wasn&#8217;t bike racing?  A story about my ride to work would not be a very good to read.  Just like my jog around the Botanical gardens is not newsworthy, the NY Marathon certainly is.  I understand that and I don&#8217;t expect it to be any different.</p>
<p>You carry a very different view and I respect that.  I encourage you to share your passion with the thousands of other cyclists like yourself and do everything you can to nurture that niche.  You&#8217;re very influential and I&#8217;m certain you&#8217;ll do very well.  </p>
<p>All my best!</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />
Wade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Wade Wallace……</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2010/01/21/dear-wade-wallace/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Wade Wallace……</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=998#comment-305</guid>
		<description>[...] You find the original post here www.situp-cycle.com/ &#8230; &#124; Mike Rubbo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You find the original post here <a href="http://www.situp-cycle.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.situp-cycle.com/</a> &#8230; | Mike Rubbo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Situp-cycle.com » Blog Archive » Dear Wade Wallace…… &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2010/01/21/dear-wade-wallace/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Situp-cycle.com » Blog Archive » Dear Wade Wallace…… &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=998#comment-304</guid>
		<description>[...] this article: Situp-cycle.com » Blog Archive » Dear Wade Wallace……   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this article: Situp-cycle.com » Blog Archive » Dear Wade Wallace……   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2010/01/21/dear-wade-wallace/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=998#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Mike, your response from Wade is very telling. Not only does it show (as you mention), how singular cycling in Australia really is - it also tells me something else - how much corporate influence there is on it. Once the corporations get their hand in the market, they hold on to it as strongly as they can.

It would be extremely unfortunate if I had to write articles on topics that keep the corporate big wigs happy. I&#039;m not saying there is anything wrong with blogging to make your living, but I&#039;m sure as hell glad I have the freedom to write about whatever I want to write about and not be a puppet for a lycra manufacturer ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, your response from Wade is very telling. Not only does it show (as you mention), how singular cycling in Australia really is &#8211; it also tells me something else &#8211; how much corporate influence there is on it. Once the corporations get their hand in the market, they hold on to it as strongly as they can.</p>
<p>It would be extremely unfortunate if I had to write articles on topics that keep the corporate big wigs happy. I&#8217;m not saying there is anything wrong with blogging to make your living, but I&#8217;m sure as hell glad I have the freedom to write about whatever I want to write about and not be a puppet for a lycra manufacturer <img src='http://www.situp-cycle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

