8 May 2010
THE REVOLUTION IS ROLLING!
Denver Colorado, just a few days ago, became the first US city to have a city wide bike share scheme up and running.
Here’s the roll out for their B Bikes on a rainy Denver day. They’ve beaten Minneapolis, by the Way which looked to be the first in the US , it’s Nice Ride scheme, now slated for June.
Bike share is revolutionary because it turbo charges bike usage wherever it lands, and that in turn calms traffic, cleans the air, and makes for a friendlier city life.
It does something else equally important. It shifts the bike culture balance towards the sit-up bike, the comfortable friendly way to ride, and away from the bent over Lycra look, still so prevalent here.
These sturdy sit-up bikes have some novel features.
Firstly, the eye is drawn to the super-sized basket, proclaiming loud and clear that this type of cycling is about practical transport, and has nothing to do with sports cycling.
Note too, that this capacious carrier has something quite novel inside, and it’s not a helmet.
That black coil is a cable lock, linked to the bike. This is a good idea because one of the great inconveniences of other share bike systems, is that the only way to lock the bike if you need to shop for example, is to find a docking station, unless carry a lock with you. I guess.
Here’s a short film showing the super comfortable B Bikes in action.
I note that all the riders are wearing helmets. They must have bought them with them because there’s no evidence of a helmet coming with the bike. Are helmets optional in Denver, anyone know?
According to the film, there’ll be 500 B bikes dispensed from 50 docking stations, making the scheme medium small.
Geek on a bike supplies some further interesting info. The bikes are made by Trek, a mainstream bike manufacturer which may have noticed how Montreal’s Bixis are on-selling briskly to cities around the world.
“Each bike is equipped with a GPS transponder(reports Geek) which talks back to the B-cycle base. While it doesn’t provide navigation during use – there’s no display on the bike itself – it does talk back to B-cycle’s servers, and allows the company to track exactly where its bikes have gone – hopefully preventing theft and ensuring that an adequate supply of bikes is kept ready at each B-station.
The GPS also uploads your journey to your member page – tracked via the unique identifier on your B-card – where you can view you travels overlaid on a map.
This information is also used to track things like personal fitness levels, average speed, calories burned, and the contribution you have made to reducing the city’s carbon footprint by ditching four wheels in favor of two.
The company’s president Bob Burns explained that the B-cycle scheme “was created for the commuter whose transit stop is two miles from the office, the urbanite running errands, and the tourist out sightseeing” rather than those planning on traveling long distances.
He describes the specialized Trek-designed cycle as “a cruiser-style bike that is comfortable for people of all sizes and biking abilities.”
Mayor of Denver John Hickenlooper said of the project that “Denver can set an example for the whole country and show that bike-sharing is a viable transportation option to help improve the overall health of Americans and reduce our carbon footprint.“
In May 2008, the Age reported that Brisbane looked set to be the fist Australian city with bike share. The city govt was promising 2000 bikes dispensed from 150 stations. So far two years later, not a bike to be seen, stymied by the helmet law, is the suspicion. (see his comment)
My friend Dr Paul Martin, Brisbane sit-up bike commuter and deep digger on this question, has been able to get nothing much out of the authorities one way or another
Meanwhile Melbourne will be first in Australia for sure. The city is set to have a much more modest bike share scheme, 100 Bixis, on it’s streets, come May 31st this year.
Can it work from a size POV? Those who run who run Velbis in Paris say that there is a critical mass below which such a scheme can’t work.
They remain a toy, a curiosity unless the stations are everywhere and the bikes as plentiful as fallen leaves in Autumn.
Melbourne is not deterred. The RACV, the massive motorist club behind this bike share scheme, is not throwing its money away one presumes
Here’s a movie of what they’ll look like, our Melb. Bixis, and how they’ll ride.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT4yV2glmuQ
Rumors have it that Bixis also have tracking devices built in, at least in the Quebec model. So, if you’re cheating on someone don’t do it on a Bixi. Your privacy is not assured!
Then, there’s the other catch 22, Our helmet law.
It’s going to be so interesting to see what happens when folks ride those Bixis without helmets, as they surely will, protesting to the cops who stop them…..
“If this bike share scheme offers me a bike without a helmet, that’s how I’ll ride it. If I picked up a rental car, I wouldn’t have to supply my on seat belt, would I?”
For some BG on this, see Bike Share and helmets don’t Mix?
Apropos of that, my last bit of revolutionary news is from Mexico City where they now have ecocbicis in that vaste city
The share bike’s name comes from the city which inspired them, Barcelona and its Bicis, share bikes, which have transformed that city too.
Violeta Brana-Lafourcade, who filmed so well for me in Denmark and Holland, (the Waltz Of The Bikes) will be be reporting on the Bicis revolution for this blog from Barcelona very soon.
Here are the Ecobicis in action in Mexico City
Note that very few Mexican bike share riders are wearing helmets.
According to Mikael Colville-Andersen, author of the very accurate blog, Copenhagenize.com. Mexico city has rescinded it’s helmet law.
Was it because bike share was deemed more valuable than the doubtful benefits of compulsory helmets, which, to be fair, people did not wear anyway?
Tel Aviv, Mikael reminds us, is flirting with the same horrible revisionistic possibility.
Mikael’s parting advice; “Got a helmet law? Don’t bother with bike share programs until you repeal it.”
OH, gloom, Australia, we may be on the slippery slope of the de-nannyization of cycling, turning back the clock to the terrible 80′s when cycling was strangely safe even without lids, when adults had choice. Horrors! Stay tuned!
And practice sitting up straight when your ride. It’s the new black.
Newsfash! Bixi, the famous Montreal share bike, has just released some interesting figures. The company, which makes and runs them, part of Montreal’s parking system, sold 9000 bikes overseas this last year, 6500 of them to London. They project a profit!
And here are local use stats. for 5000 Bixis in Montreal itself last summer.
BIXI IN NUMBERS
1.14 million: rides taken in 2009.
32,098: Bixis taken or returned at the busiest station (at Mont Royal
métro station).
10,775: People who bought subscriptions in 2009.
179,683: Average number of Bixi rides taken on Fridays, the system’s busiest day.
5 to 6 p.m.: most popular time to ride a Bixi.
48: percentage of users taking Bixis to reach work or school.
59: percentage of Bixi subscribers who also own their own bike.
25 to 44: the age range of most Bixi subscribers.
85: Percentage of subscribers with university degrees.
34: Percentage of subscribers who live in Plateau Mont Royal, the biggest source of Bixi users.
Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Bixi+projects+profit+even+with+contract/2996635/story.html#ixzz0nToR7api
Mike Rubbo




Brisbane is working on a bike share scheme too. It will be interesting to see how they handle the helmet issue.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/bicycle-hire-scheme-to-make-brisbane-a-dinkum-paris/story-e6frg6oo-1111116377434
Stephen
May 8th, 2010 at 1:56 pmpermalink
Mike,
I’m not quite sure of what to make of bike share schemes in Australia, particularly those sponsored by automobile associations!
At least our CityCycle in Brisbane isn’t sponsored by the RACQ!
The other concerns I have are:
Helmets
The response I have from Brisbane City Council is this:
“It is expected that the majority of users will be long-term subscribers as opposed to casual users or tourists.”
and
“Council supports the current helmet laws for the protection and safety of all cyclists and will not request the relaxation of these laws for CityCycle.”
and
“While long-term subscribers will be able to purchase a helmet… (council) is investigating opportunities to provide helmets for hire to casual users.”
So, there you have it. Helmets will stay and they don’t have a solution.
Initial Numbers
The initial Melbourne rollout is far too small to work. Brisbane will be rolling out (in the first phase) about six times the Melbourne amount and in the end will supposedly have 2000 bikes at 160 stations by next year. If the bike stations are not closely spaced then people will not use it. It is bad enough if a station is not near your destination; even worse if it is full and you can’t return the bike!
David Hembrow is sceptical of bike share schemes and I can see why, however there may be some effects of such schemes in Australia that will not be seen in Europe:
- increasing the exposure of the situp bike to the general public being the main one I can think of.
Most people associate cycling here with speed, bent-over postures and fancy gear, not transport. Situp bikes like these, by being more visible, might help by showing people there is another type of bicycle around – something more practical.
I still feel that in the face of mandatory helmet laws these schemes will fail. When they do, councils will throw up their arms and say ‘we built it and they didn’t come; perhaps the public doesn’t want to cycle after all’ and that will be that. Then they’ll have an excuse to not provide all the other things that will make cycling safe: slower cars, bicycle lanes and paths, etc.
I’m suspicious.
Great post, Mike.
Cheers,
Paul Martin
Brisbane, Australia
Dr Paul Martin
May 9th, 2010 at 3:56 pmpermalink
Interesting statistics from the Montreal Bike Share, Mike. Do they have mandatory helmets there? They don’t mention it in the article.
Cheers,
Paul
Dr Paul Martin
May 10th, 2010 at 3:13 ampermalink
Hi Mike, it looks like helmets are optional in Denver, according to a this site: http://www.bhsi.org/mandator.htm
However, House Bill 1147 -almost- resulted in children being required to wear helmets. Then the Senate removed that section, according to this article:
http://bicyclecolo.org/articles/safer-street-for-children-pg1091.htm
One last site which had a humorous slant on the bill (love the xray photo at the top)
http://www.coloradofreedom.net/wordpress/colorado-newsinfo/hb-1147-helmet-law-aims-to-fix-colorados-helmet-epidemic
-JR
John Romeo Alpha
May 10th, 2010 at 9:29 pmpermalink
Daft helmet laws aside, has anyone noticed that the more car-addicted the city, the less attractive the bicycles? Sorry, I love Melbourne, but that ungainly blue monstrosity is never going to win any design awards.
Adam
May 11th, 2010 at 10:04 pmpermalink
Good to see that bike share schemes are spreading everywhere.
I doubt that helmets will be an issue.
Most people will ignore it, just like they ignore so many other useless laws.
Harvey
May 12th, 2010 at 12:09 ampermalink
Well, Adam, Montreal has fallen in love with the same bike, and in a huge way. Moreover, this bike is the best seller of all the bikes models around the world. It’s proving a nice little earner for Quebec’s Alcan. Mike
Mike Rubbo
May 12th, 2010 at 4:30 pmpermalink
I’ll put it out there – I love bicycles but I’m skeptical of bicycle share systems in Australia and it’s not because of helmets. Why?
Because to want to hire a bicycle for a few days in a city that you don’t know and is probably not cycle-friendly (because it’s in Australia…) you’d have to be:
1 – a tourist. It’s a good way to do some sightseeing
2 – bike crazy, like me. I can’t handle being a city without a bike so it’s convenient
Why would a long term user use bike share? They’d own a bike themselves. I reject that it’s actually more convenient to find your bike hire spot, get a bike, ride it somewhere else, leave it there etc than to just get around on your own bike.
So who is going to use these bikes? A few tourists I suppose.
Maurice
Maurice
May 15th, 2010 at 7:45 ampermalink
@ Maurice
I agree and those ‘few tourists’ will be put off by the helmets so nobody will use them… sadly.
Paul
Dr Paul Martin
May 15th, 2010 at 3:28 pmpermalink
Yep, my forecast is for a colossal expensive white elephant
Steve
May 16th, 2010 at 12:01 ampermalink
Hi All
Interesting to see the various bicycle share schemes and the results of having mandatory helmet laws on them. Victorian government is now giving away free passes to trying to get people to use it but as we all know you get a nice big fine if you don’t have helmet. ! It seems almost sadistic to offer someone something then have the police fine them i would consider it a form of entrapment entierly for the purpose of revenu raising.
I have been fined and pulled over several times as have friends and work mates because of the mandatory helmet laws and will continue to fight against them and for common sense.
My advise is vote for the LDP. Libertarian policy is that victim-less crimes should not be punished and the LDP website specifically lists removing bicycle helmet laws on their website at ldp.org.au. check the policy section under Victimless Crimes.
I have met with them at their open monthly meeting here in SA, they are interested to help, and they need more members so if anyone is interested in the libertarian ideals it’s free and is online at ldp.org.au
It’s an opportunity to get some political representation which no other party seems prepared to offer us.
If Cyclists vote for and Support the LDP even if just for this one reason eventually the majors will take notice and we will see a change to the helmet laws sooner rather then later.
Regards Steve.
stephen
September 10th, 2010 at 10:12 pmpermalink