<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toss the Albatross: Bike share needs helmet choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/</link>
	<description>Sitting up straight; The key to growing urban cycling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 11:33:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bike Hire Brisbane</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/comment-page-1/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>Bike Hire Brisbane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=3769#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>A well researched article. I suppose at the end of the day its about choice but at the same time there is no doubting that helmets save lives. Maybe it would have been better if the government gave money to its citizens to go by a bike so then you can have one all year round and then just install a lot more bicycle racks to compensate for the explosion of bikes in the city. It has the same success rate of Brisbanes scheme which might as well be nought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A well researched article. I suppose at the end of the day its about choice but at the same time there is no doubting that helmets save lives. Maybe it would have been better if the government gave money to its citizens to go by a bike so then you can have one all year round and then just install a lot more bicycle racks to compensate for the explosion of bikes in the city. It has the same success rate of Brisbanes scheme which might as well be nought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rubbo</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/comment-page-1/#comment-1341</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rubbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 05:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=3769#comment-1341</guid>
		<description>Yes, because because choice for all is not politically possible in one go. Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, because because choice for all is not politically possible in one go. Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montrealize</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/comment-page-1/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Montrealize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 05:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=3769#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>What are you advocating a helmet exemption and not simply the removal of this sutpid law once for all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you advocating a helmet exemption and not simply the removal of this sutpid law once for all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Towards Bikeopolis, Part 2: The Berkshire Review Guide to Enjoying your Bicycle - Berkshire Review, an International Journal for the Arts</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/comment-page-1/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>Towards Bikeopolis, Part 2: The Berkshire Review Guide to Enjoying your Bicycle - Berkshire Review, an International Journal for the Arts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 20:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=3769#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>[...] The same goes for Barcelona, London and other cities with flourishing bike share programs (the troubles of Melbourne’s bike sharing scheme support the conclusion that bike share and helmets don’t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The same goes for Barcelona, London and other cities with flourishing bike share programs (the troubles of Melbourne’s bike sharing scheme support the conclusion that bike share and helmets don’t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheap bikes melbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>cheap bikes melbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 01:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=3769#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>The Melbourne bikes shown in the top photos really need helmets. Because its specially for city purpose where there is a lot traffic. I haven&#039;t seen any people wearing helment when they ride these bikes because you can get them by inserting coins so it&#039;s obvious you may not have helmet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Melbourne bikes shown in the top photos really need helmets. Because its specially for city purpose where there is a lot traffic. I haven&#8217;t seen any people wearing helment when they ride these bikes because you can get them by inserting coins so it&#8217;s obvious you may not have helmet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 05:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=3769#comment-936</guid>
		<description>I agree with dave, there are too many wankers who view riding (particularly commuters) as a tour de france time trail. I am a BMX bandit from the early 80&#039;s and have not died out. For all those who want to develop cycling as a culture, live (Like I did for 4 years) in Holland, and see that people cycle coz it&#039;s the easiest way to get around, most efficient way to park and is socially excepted. There are networks of separation, and no growly fools in cars to shunt you off the road. The network is also consistent!! Bike is #1, and rspected. I can&#039;t beleive the idiots that put up with peak hour trafic and spend time going nowhere on a daily basis( try macaulay road in kensington melbourne for example). Melbourne bike hire scheme is a good idea, but what for those tourists riding in the Melbourne CBD with no lanes, parked cars on the kerbside and oops, riding on the other side of the road. Sorry, didn&#039;t see you mate. What I also love, is those drivers pulling out from side streets into a congested road to advance 10 feet, only achieving so much as to sticking there nose out so cyclists can&#039;t pass. Australia, is a dumb blonde for transport infrastructure! Plenty of nature strip, sidewalk that oozes potential for redevelopment. Government spends too much money on faesibility studies without looking at the basics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with dave, there are too many wankers who view riding (particularly commuters) as a tour de france time trail. I am a BMX bandit from the early 80&#8242;s and have not died out. For all those who want to develop cycling as a culture, live (Like I did for 4 years) in Holland, and see that people cycle coz it&#8217;s the easiest way to get around, most efficient way to park and is socially excepted. There are networks of separation, and no growly fools in cars to shunt you off the road. The network is also consistent!! Bike is #1, and rspected. I can&#8217;t beleive the idiots that put up with peak hour trafic and spend time going nowhere on a daily basis( try macaulay road in kensington melbourne for example). Melbourne bike hire scheme is a good idea, but what for those tourists riding in the Melbourne CBD with no lanes, parked cars on the kerbside and oops, riding on the other side of the road. Sorry, didn&#8217;t see you mate. What I also love, is those drivers pulling out from side streets into a congested road to advance 10 feet, only achieving so much as to sticking there nose out so cyclists can&#8217;t pass. Australia, is a dumb blonde for transport infrastructure! Plenty of nature strip, sidewalk that oozes potential for redevelopment. Government spends too much money on faesibility studies without looking at the basics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rubbo</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/comment-page-1/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rubbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=3769#comment-928</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an important story you tell, Jo pointing  to what is seriously wrong. I&#039;ll  email about this for further talk. Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an important story you tell, Jo pointing  to what is seriously wrong. I&#8217;ll  email about this for further talk. Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Henshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/comment-page-1/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Henshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 05:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=3769#comment-927</guid>
		<description>Separate bike infrastructure is a superb thing. I am 100 percent for it. However, separate paths are only part of the solution in Australia.

The other part is the attitude of riders. I have stopped using the ( in theory) excellent bike path along the river because of the ridiculous macho attitude of many of the wankers who use it, who seem to think that being overtaken by other riders or having to slow momentarily in order to overtake safely is somehow beneath their dignity as serious cyclists.

Around a month ago, following any number of near misses, I was finally bought to earth by one of these tools. I was riding around a bend at my usual sedate pace. There were 2 cyclists riding abreast approaching from the other direction, with about 100 metres of clear path behind them. Suddenly, a bearded wonder in lycra swept around from behind me, moving atvspeed, trying to get around and in front of me. He didn&#039;t have room to do, so he wound up clipping my front wheel, bringing himself to the deck, and sending me flying over his bike and landing in the middle of the road. 

If this goon slowed down and waited 10 seconds, he could have passed with complete safety, but he preferred to take a bone-headed risk in order to shore up his own self-image as a hard-ass competitive rider.

In every part of Melbourne where cyclists gather, you see this numbskull attitude. It is part of why, in my opinion, our ridership skews heavily in favour of males. Women want to ride for and exercise, not to participate in a pissing contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Separate bike infrastructure is a superb thing. I am 100 percent for it. However, separate paths are only part of the solution in Australia.</p>
<p>The other part is the attitude of riders. I have stopped using the ( in theory) excellent bike path along the river because of the ridiculous macho attitude of many of the wankers who use it, who seem to think that being overtaken by other riders or having to slow momentarily in order to overtake safely is somehow beneath their dignity as serious cyclists.</p>
<p>Around a month ago, following any number of near misses, I was finally bought to earth by one of these tools. I was riding around a bend at my usual sedate pace. There were 2 cyclists riding abreast approaching from the other direction, with about 100 metres of clear path behind them. Suddenly, a bearded wonder in lycra swept around from behind me, moving atvspeed, trying to get around and in front of me. He didn&#8217;t have room to do, so he wound up clipping my front wheel, bringing himself to the deck, and sending me flying over his bike and landing in the middle of the road. </p>
<p>If this goon slowed down and waited 10 seconds, he could have passed with complete safety, but he preferred to take a bone-headed risk in order to shore up his own self-image as a hard-ass competitive rider.</p>
<p>In every part of Melbourne where cyclists gather, you see this numbskull attitude. It is part of why, in my opinion, our ridership skews heavily in favour of males. Women want to ride for and exercise, not to participate in a pissing contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=3769#comment-908</guid>
		<description>Bike share schemes are too good an opportunity for &#039;normal&#039; cycling to squander.

If you live in Australia, you can do something about it by writing to your state member to have these crippling laws repealed.

All it takes is 5 mins to copy, paste and print one of these letters. http://helmetfreedom.org/145/helmet-exemption-for-bike-share/?official=366

There&#039;s plenty there so please please please, do this once a month until the law is repealed and let our pollies know that we like helmets but hate helmet laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bike share schemes are too good an opportunity for &#8216;normal&#8217; cycling to squander.</p>
<p>If you live in Australia, you can do something about it by writing to your state member to have these crippling laws repealed.</p>
<p>All it takes is 5 mins to copy, paste and print one of these letters. <a href="http://helmetfreedom.org/145/helmet-exemption-for-bike-share/?official=366" rel="nofollow">http://helmetfreedom.org/145/helmet-exemption-for-bike-share/?official=366</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s plenty there so please please please, do this once a month until the law is repealed and let our pollies know that we like helmets but hate helmet laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Kilburn</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Kilburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=3769#comment-906</guid>
		<description>Cycling advocates in Vancouver, Canada are watching Melbourne with more than a fair bit of anxiety.

Slated to be the first major North American city to host a public bike share system, and provide a showcase example to the world during the 2010 winter Olympic games, the scheme has been placed on hold, due in great part to our all ages mandatory helmet law.

During the delay, a number of successful PSB systems have sprung up around North America, including one in Montreal, Canada.

Despite being told by administrators of successful PBS around the world that mandatory helmet use would impact PSB use negatively, the belief that helmet legislation saves lives has led both the city and provincial governments to keep the helmet law in place, in spite of the risk of failure of the initiative.

Auckland, New Zealand, Melbourne and now Brisbane, Australia, have been the only examples of PSB with mandatory helmet use, and they haven’t been pretty ones. 

It’s possible the experience down under may yet again halt the start of Vancouver’s system. City politicians are up for re-election this year and the opposition would love nothing better than to hold the current administration to task for investing in a system that isn’t being used.

Funny how in places like London or Montreal, the presiding mayor improves his standing through the success of their well used PSB systems, but in Vancouver, the initiative is being handled like a bomb; the Mayor Robinson doesn’t want it to blow up on him and kill his good standing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cycling advocates in Vancouver, Canada are watching Melbourne with more than a fair bit of anxiety.</p>
<p>Slated to be the first major North American city to host a public bike share system, and provide a showcase example to the world during the 2010 winter Olympic games, the scheme has been placed on hold, due in great part to our all ages mandatory helmet law.</p>
<p>During the delay, a number of successful PSB systems have sprung up around North America, including one in Montreal, Canada.</p>
<p>Despite being told by administrators of successful PBS around the world that mandatory helmet use would impact PSB use negatively, the belief that helmet legislation saves lives has led both the city and provincial governments to keep the helmet law in place, in spite of the risk of failure of the initiative.</p>
<p>Auckland, New Zealand, Melbourne and now Brisbane, Australia, have been the only examples of PSB with mandatory helmet use, and they haven’t been pretty ones. </p>
<p>It’s possible the experience down under may yet again halt the start of Vancouver’s system. City politicians are up for re-election this year and the opposition would love nothing better than to hold the current administration to task for investing in a system that isn’t being used.</p>
<p>Funny how in places like London or Montreal, the presiding mayor improves his standing through the success of their well used PSB systems, but in Vancouver, the initiative is being handled like a bomb; the Mayor Robinson doesn’t want it to blow up on him and kill his good standing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/comment-page-1/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 05:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=3769#comment-905</guid>
		<description>As someone who has spent a considerable time in both London &amp; Dublin it has to be said that the climate in Melbourne is much more conducive to cycling. Therefore, why are our elected officials not asking questions about the failure (and cost) of the bike shares in Melbourne &amp; Brisbane? If taxpayers money was being wasted on any other initiative there would be some form of inquiry to asertain why. It seems amazing that no political party is willing to approach the issue with even the Greens remaining silent on this one. It is an embarrassment to watch our politicians bury their heads in the sand while the rest of the world watches &amp; laughs at our incompetence to implement a very simple scheme which has been a proven success worldwide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who has spent a considerable time in both London &amp; Dublin it has to be said that the climate in Melbourne is much more conducive to cycling. Therefore, why are our elected officials not asking questions about the failure (and cost) of the bike shares in Melbourne &amp; Brisbane? If taxpayers money was being wasted on any other initiative there would be some form of inquiry to asertain why. It seems amazing that no political party is willing to approach the issue with even the Greens remaining silent on this one. It is an embarrassment to watch our politicians bury their heads in the sand while the rest of the world watches &amp; laughs at our incompetence to implement a very simple scheme which has been a proven success worldwide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micheal Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.situp-cycle.com/2011/01/13/toss-the-albatross/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Micheal Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.situp-cycle.com/?p=3769#comment-904</guid>
		<description>Very good point, Mike.  Separate (good quality) paths are the only way to get more people biking.  It&#039;s next to impossible to have a bike spill on a good bike trail.  Perhaps the reason why politicians seem to ignore this is the initial cost of building the paths.  However, the return on investment is very good over long term in so many different ways, not only financially.  As a bonus, while they construct the new bike paths, they can upgrade whatever other infructructure is in that place.
I&#039;m very fortunate here in Toronto that I live right by a nice separate bike trail crossing the city east-west.  Though it&#039;s true that a part of my commute is along normal city streets, as well.  If my whole commute had to be along city streets, I would stop biking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point, Mike.  Separate (good quality) paths are the only way to get more people biking.  It&#8217;s next to impossible to have a bike spill on a good bike trail.  Perhaps the reason why politicians seem to ignore this is the initial cost of building the paths.  However, the return on investment is very good over long term in so many different ways, not only financially.  As a bonus, while they construct the new bike paths, they can upgrade whatever other infructructure is in that place.<br />
I&#8217;m very fortunate here in Toronto that I live right by a nice separate bike trail crossing the city east-west.  Though it&#8217;s true that a part of my commute is along normal city streets, as well.  If my whole commute had to be along city streets, I would stop biking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

