« Older Entries Newer Entries » Subscribe to Latest Posts

17 Apr 2010

It’s All Happening This Week!

Posted by Mike Rubbo. 7 Comments

This coming week will be an exciting one in my bike world.
Guim valls Teruel, the Spaniard who is riding around the world on his E bike will arrive in Sydney, he promises, towing his trailer with it’s solar panel.

I have my doubts Guim make it in time. He told me by mobile that today, Sunday 18th, he was lingering way too far north , one would think, doing the Nimbin markets.

He’s found that the best places in Australia to promote his E bike as the perfect Eco vehicle, (since arriving from NZ a month ago) are local produce markets.

Anyway, Guim assures me he can, if pushed, do 200 kms. a day. I guess he’ knows what he’s doing, having ridden 10,000 kms. already from Beijing.

I’m hoping he makes it in time for Friday, for a possible meeting with Lord Tony Berkeley, who I’ve been asked to show around Sydney on a bike. Lord Berkeley is a keen utility cyclist in Britain

Since, I don’t know the new bike plans for Sydney very well, I’ve asked City of Sydney’s Fiona Campbell to host the ride as I’ll make the movie.

Lord Berkeley a Labor Peer, and British rail expert, is in Australia to discuss rail freight, I believe. He is also a spokesman in the British Parliament on bike policy.

I have some wider hopes for his visit. CTC, the venerable British bike organization which contacted me, is doing much to promote cycling politically in the UK.

Going to their site, I find the CTC is making bikes an election issue in Britain with their Vote Bike campaign.

How one wishes some Pollie was putting questions in our parliament and, Oh, for bikes to be an election issue here as well.

So, this contact,and the future networking which I hope comes of it, may help us raise the political status of utility cycling here through some sort of cross pollination .

Right now, neither party at the Federal level. seems much interested in Cycling as transport.

Here is a film the CTC posted about visiting Cambridge, one of the most Bike conscious cities on Britain. Thanks to Carlton Reid for the film

The narration makes a telling point. In that town, planning automatically brings in bikes because they are so well embedded in the public consciousness. We need to get to that state and stage.

Anyway, what will be, will be in terms of who arrives. and who’s held up this coming week.

There’s plenty else that’s exciting coing up.

Maurice Wells who runs what we think it Sydney’s first bike shop, a store front in Marrickville, Glow Worm Bicycles, is making plans to host Guim. Sydney cyclists will have a change to meet him and see his solar system at the shop.

Here is Maurice in red, at the launch of his shop.

And here’s a great mural Maurice had on the shop wall

But the really big news is this. For years, the RTA, our State road body, has been working on changes in the rules for E bikes to bring us into line with Europe.

Somehow the RTA, a NSW org. seem to be in charge of coordinating the changes nationally

Friday the 16th, selected people in the bike world got an Email from Gabriel Denoury, the RTA guy who’s been working on the new policy I was not one of them, but it was soon leaked to me.

My nose is slightly out of joint in that I’d made numerous suggestions to Mr. Denoury 9 months ago when the policy was open for comment, and thought he’d promised to let me know, as a stakeholder, when the changes came through

Never mind. The important thing is that the changes are mostly very good,

In big picture terms, it will mean that the E bike will come out of the shadows here and present itself, I’m quite sure, as a very appealing alternative to the car for shortish trips

Better yet, if the 250 watt motors we will soon be allowed to use are partnered with the classic sit-up configuration, then we really have a knockout winner in terms of comfort, safety and carrying capacity for urban getting around

You may laugh, but my prediction is that 5 years from now, this will be the bike combo of choice for anyone serious about a bike as urban transport .

The very young and fit may turn up their noses at such assistance, but when they get round of carrying a kid, large shopping loads, even moving house by bike, as folks love to do in Portland, Oregon, then the E bike is going to look very good.

It will also be a bike you can be proud to be seen, I feel.

I mean how about this, superb gazelle Innegy, the Rolls Royce of E bikes? Can’t you see your self on that?

And if you want something more BMW-Like, how about this Giant Freedom Twist?

I ride a Giant Suede with a motor I added on, a kit, and the cheaper way to go.

Mine is to a somewhat grubbier Giant, but I love it just the same. (time to say again I have no financial interest in E bikes, rather something far more deadly. a philosophical interest.

Guim will spoil my party somewhat because his Wisper, a great E bike, is not a sit up. I can forgive him that, given the long distances he rides. I guess he’s not going to switch his handlebars for my photo op.

The changes, (thanks, Gabriel and the team) mean that we can now import these great bikes from Europe and the US, they being 250 Watts.

My friend, Dr Paul Martin in Brisbane has jumped that gun and is already on a Gazelle, tuned down to 200 watts, I assume.

Why do I think E bikes are the future of urban transport the real alternative to the car? because of the look I imagine my little Diahatsu Sirion gives me every time I leave on the bike and leave it behind

As I come out of our car port, too stuffed with junk to hold an actual car, I see my bike and my car side by side. Which will i choose for the journey ahead?

Why do I choose the bike most of the time?

Because, even though my the car is as economical as they get and quite fun to drive, the bike will feel better.

More importantly, I know there is no hill ahead which will give me pain. amd wish I was in the Sirion. I’ll work hard on a couple of rises, but no get-off-and-push, pain.

With the E bike, I control the ride, not the terrain.

I think that’s a key recurring moment in one’s transport life. If that moment and my choice, could be multiplied into millionsof people coming out, looking at their transport options and choosing the bike most of the time, that would be the changing of Australia.

And way for the better. We know our car addiction is killing us.

Now, I’m not saying the E bike is transport methadone, though my friend David Hembow in Holland might like that analogy. I’m saying its a bit intermediate and something the public, the bike hostile public, can get their heads around .

Hostile in the sense as bikes as transport. Everyone likes the ides of biking around our pretty waterways, but doesn’t count

The E bike gives that dream a chance. The regular push bike does not, not for most people who are now not riding, and not thinking of riding.

I know you don’t believe me. That’s OK, you haven’t tried one of these E bikes. When you have, you’ll believe too.

It promises to be an interesting week.

I do have a quibble with the RTA regulations, now awaiting Federal approval (Go on, Minister Garrett, give it a shove, will ya?) and that is their plan to do away with the throttle which I think is silly and an overdone copying of Europe .

You can sample a discussion the throttle on Sydney cyclist. here

As I said in a letter to Gabriel Denoury, if we are going to copy Europe so slavishly, let’s put our gas prices up to the same level as theirs. i.e double, and then spend the extra money on bike-ways, like they do over there.

How about that. eh?

15 Apr 2010

Different Bikes for Different Hikes (plus more)

Posted by Mike Rubbo. 5 Comments

1. Collaborating with James Schwartz .
2. Growing a second bike culture.
3. Electric bike predictions. A big future for them.
4. Round the World E bike Rider,Guim Valls Teruel, is almost here
5. Sydney’s first all E bike shop is open and will host Guim
6. Bicycle NSW to host Guim also
6. The visit of Lord Tony Berkeley from GB..

I’ve made blog friends with James Schwartz who write a blog called The urban Country in Toronto.

We agreed to explore together the idea of people riding different bikes in different situations.

His movie, Bike it my Way, is responding to this one of mine, Bike it or Not, about Gill Charlton which you’ve probably already seen.

It’s great fun, collaborating like this! Anyone else want to try?

Here’s how James describes our, across-the-world movie making.

Mike Rubbo asked me if I would like to engage in international collaboration on two videos that highlight women cyclists who – in Mike’s words – choose different bikes for different hikes.

So, I set out to find a woman who would fit the profile – somebody who wears the lycra racing gear (and a helmet) on weekends, but rides a stylish sit-up bicycle during the week (sans helmet). Yvonne Bambrick – the Executive Director for the Toronto Cyclists Union – put me in touch with the passionate Toronto cyclist, Briana Illingworth.

Briana is a fascinating person and was a perfect match because her love for cycling extends not only on her commute to work – but in her job itself.

Briana is a Transportation Policy and Planning Advisor for Metrolinx – the provincial organization setup to “champion, develop and implement an integrated transportation system [in the Greater Toronto area] that enhances prosperity, sustainability and quality of life”.

Briana’s focus is on Active Transportation and her vision is a community where people have the option to get around on bicycles without any special clothing or equipment. I took footage of Briana on a weekend in her racing gear and on a weekday in her regular clothes without a helmet.

Me again. I feel that celebrating cross over riding is really important. Especially in Australia where the sports/leisure cycling culture is so dominant, so smothering, one could say.

How about, Cross biking? That’s when you use, different bikes for different hikes.

2. We need to grow up an alternative, namely utility cycling. And it’s best that this is happening, not in opposition, but in partnership with people like Gill and Briana showing that you can enjoy both .

Jim Forbes sent me this great photo from Queensland. What does it tell me? That in simpler times, 1939 in Bundaberg, Queensland, your bike was two things.

These blokes have clearly turned their handlebars up as they ride to work, if that’s where they’re going .


(Thanks to the State Library of Queensland)

Weekends, one imagines they turned them down and went faster.

3. I predict two things are going to happen as we grow utility cycling here.

A. Most of us will be sitting up straight as these blokes are doing. Probably not by turning up drops (Is that still possible?) but by riding proper made-to-order sit ups.

B, Now, this might surprise you, I predict that most bikes for getting around 5 years from now, will have an electrical assist, a small motor for a boost.

I think will happen because sitting up straight with a small helpful motor, you end up with the perfect utility bike. It will either be charge at home by solar or even as you ride.

Another reason this makes sense is the very same reason that some people now disparage sit-ups, namely lower performance.

The motor lifts performance so that as you sit-up right on an E bike like the fabulous gazelle which won bike of the year against all tyes no face no impediments

The motor helps with the greater wind resistance sitting up straight provokes, The motor helps with carrying loads, which you’ll want to do a lot if you bike is your main vehicle, as it will one day be.

More and more small deliveries will be made by E bike, not only of you, your kids, your dog, you shopping, but business deliveries

Maybe this happen more in high bike resistance countries like Australia and NZ, where even getting people to “think Bike” is very hard.

Now, in Bruges, Belgium where I took this delightful photo (a favourite ) a motor may never be necessary, the terrain being so flat and sheltered, and the people so bike-habituated

But here, where everything’s hard, both psychologically and physically, that extra oomph, and it’s a very small oomph, will allow you to control the trip in a way which makes all the difference. .

With that boost, you create the bike experience you want to have, not the terrain dictating your ride. Flat and windless, your motor’s off. Hilly and feeling a bit puffed, motor’s on.

They’ll also start breaking records when folks discover that E bikes are so much fun

That’s why I see an E bike future here, that is when you are biking about, not working out.

This is a great article by Vincent , which sums up the E bike situation globally right now, plus the arguments against such bikes.

Did you know there are now 120 million E bikes in China, up by 20 million since last year, that they are the fastest growing marker sngment in Europe, euro-wise?

I love author Vincent’s remark about E bikes and exercise. They do give plenty of exercise but not a work out, unless you switch the motor off.

He points out that If you are seriously working out on a bike, (and most Aust. cyclists are doing just that most of the time) having a motor makes about as much sense as electro-boosting all that shiny equipment at Fitness First, or the gym of your choice.

Here’s a movie I don’t think I’ve posted before which proves, inadvertently, that the the electro boosted sit-up bike performs superbly against flat bars, and on hilly terrain.

I say, “inadvertently” because the intention was to prove something else when I got roped in as a guinea pig.

All of this is very relevant as Guim Valls Teruel, the cheery Spaniard, on his electric Wisper, bears down on us.

4. Guim is on his way from Brisbane to Sydney as I write, and will stay with Katya and I, some night next week, before riding on to Sydney, perhaps with me beside him.

5. Now, it so happens that Sydney now has it’s first all electric bike shop

Glowworm Bicycles in Marrickville Maurice Wells, who’s started it, came to a talk I gave, and we’ve become friends.

I suggested to Maurice that it would make sense to host Guim’s visit, stage a get together at the new shop, and it seems that’s now on.

It looks possible that Bicycle NSW will also host a visit by Guim to their offices. That’d be great as well.

So, as you see, so much is happening here.

6. And if that was not enough, a Labor peer, the bloke who asks questions in the British Parliament for the CTC, the venerable British biking organization, Lord Tony Berkeley is coming to Sydney next week.

CTC has asked me to host him on a bike ride around town.

Flattered though I am, I’m not the right person and so I’ve brought in Fiona Campbell Transport Officer, Cycling, for the city of Sydney.

Fiona knows much more about the 70 kms. of new bike-ways they are building in Sydney, and thus is better placed to play host to the labor Peer. I’ll just do the filming.

I suspect that CTC’s interest in me doing a film about the visit is tied in with the British Elections. CTC has a Vote Bike campaign in full swing.

Oh, how we dream of having utility cycling become a Federal issue here, with questions in Parliament, indignant voices demanding answers as to why we lag so far behind.

Will it ever happen? How ironic it is that our leader of the opposition, Tony Abbott has been in the saddle for week in an impressive charity ride from Melb. to Sydne.

Yet it seems never to have occurred to him that his great ride was the perfect platform from which to announce a bold new policy for the Coalition, surely a huge vote winner.

Cheers, Mike

28 Mar 2010

The Electric Bike Debate

Posted by Mike Rubbo. 37 Comments

Both Mickael Colville-Andersen and David Hembrow are great guys. Both are doing so much to promote utility cycling.

David takes the trouble to give me frequent good advice, especially about infrastructure which for him, is key. Safety is under the wheels, certainly not on the head as they wish us to believe here.

Mikael has run some of my bike movies on his blog, Copenhagenize.com. which has much increased their reach and impact.

He’s also supported our campaign to promote sit-up bikes in Australia (see March 18th on his bog)

But when it come to Electric bikes, sadly, we part company, they and I. Mikael regards them as lazy bikes, and David insists they are strictly for the old and/or infirm

I think that’s not true and that both go against their own thinking when they say so.

Mikael is both funny and apt when he compares a bike to a vacuum cleaner. His points is that we should not over romanticize or fetish-ize the bike.

It’s just a tool like a vacuum cleaner, and about equally sexy most of the time .

By that argument if the E bike is useful, then it’s an extension of the tool that’ll be right for some circumstances, and we shouldn’t get too worked up about it and call it names like, lazy bike

Just like some vacuums cleaners roll along, beating the hell out of carpet, and others merely suck, bikes work differently too.

David points out that people ride, and will ride more, when it’s fun, that being safe is a big part of the fun, and that being safe is in turn, a matter of separated bike paths. All perfectly sensible.

Now, if I say that steep hills and carrying loads on a bike, are not necessarily fun, depending on your fitness level, the heat of day, etc. and that I need help, I shouldn’t be made to feel like a wuss.

Hills and loads do come into the fun equation hard and fast! .

Every one of our of journeys involves quite complex option and enjoyment assessment, especially in countries where to use a bike is exceptional, and bike-ways a sparse or non existent.

Now, unless one does a Rip Van Winkle, going to sleep with the alarm clock set to wake you in 30 years time when the bike ways have all been built, unless that, you have to make do with what you’ve got, all the while kicking and screaming for separated paths.

For example, take my trip to the shops this morning , I’m just back. I’ts 11.5 kms. round trip. I went on the bike, my saddle bags ready play their role. No bike ways at all.

Here’s my bulging saddle bags on the moment of arriving back.

Here’s what they contained, arranged as nicely as I can. The weight of my load, 25 kilos.

Here too is the log slow incline on Hillside road up to the house. This, I just climbed on the last leg of the homeward journey. It goes up for 1.6 kms. The gradient is not so steep, but many people on bikes do walk up it, lazy sods.

I think you wouldn’t be at all surprised, given that hill, the overall distance and expected load , when i say that I wouldn’t have dreamt of going by bike if I didn’t have my small electrical assist, my tiny 200 watt motor.

it would not have been the slightest bit fun. Yet, with that small amount of help, it was indeed fun.

So that is why, anticipating that fun, especially the marvelous free wheeling down that same hill, the wind in my hair, on the outward journey, that I took my E bike and not the car, sitting night next to it on the drive.

I saw only one other bike during the 45 min. trip there and back, and yet I bet every driver I passed has a bike tucked away in the garage. We do buy more cars than bikes, you know. (but the wrong sort)

Yet it occurred to none of those drivers, on their various journeys, to think the bike might be practical and fun.

Now that could be, not only because they are indeed car addicted, car coddled in terms of gas prices, taxes, etc. but because the hills around here make utility cycling no fun

So, I would like David to see that the TOBs, (my short hand for trips on bikes) would/could go way up if there was not this constant preaching against the E bike as the lazy bike, the illegitimate bike, the cheating bike.,

As David love to pint out, people don’t ride bike in Holland for hair shirt reasons, the are not pedal power missionaries. They are just getting around in the most practical and pleasant way possible.

Well what if, in a much more vast range of circumstances than my colleagues will admit, the E bike is practical and pleasant? What then?

Would you rather have people in cars, for that’s where they are, on or such bikes?

I forgot to mention, that the E bike in Australia is mired in a regulative mess. For years now, state bodies like the RTA in NSW have been trying raise the legal motor size to 250 watts which would bring us in line with Europe and Japan

This would mean that we could could import great bikes like the Gazelle Innergy from Holland, presently illegal with its 250 watt motor.

That’s good. One just wishes the Fed Govt would show some leadership and hurry this along. It’s they now who are the stumbling block.

But wise as this change is, it is quite foolish to align our E bikes with the European rule that all E bikes have to be Pedelcs. This means that the motor will only come on when you pedal.

You have the choice of no motor at all, or varying degrees of automatic assistance, depending on the sophistication and price of the bike

Why is Pedelec a problem when its clearly designed to stop people treating the E bike as a low powered motor bike, i.e. one on which you can just sit and twist, not pedal at all.

Surely that’s good? you say. Well no, it’s not at all . Firstly the problem is a furphy. Even at 250 watts, the power is so low that anyone who wants to hoon around, will go for something more powerful, a motor scooter or motorbike.

Secondly, the motors all cut out at around 25 kph, way slower than you can do on an ordinary bike, and so there is no chance of a throttle turning these bikes into speed machines.

My bike has both Pedelec and a throttle which is ideal

There is some sort of moralizing behind this move. It’s like you had a limiter on your car, dictating on how you drove it for safety or ecological reasons. Which motorists would accept that their car dd not perform freely, that they were not making all decisions?

Why does it matter? With the throttle, you can use as little power as you like, use the battery as sparingly as you like, without th machine deciding for you .

For example in a head wind, I use my throttle to deliver just a touch of power, and thus conserve my battery charge.

Srcondly, at traffic lights, it so convenient to have power to get away fast and not be in the way of cars starting up behind you.

This, you can do with the throttle of course, but not with the pwdelec because you have to be in motion, pedaling, for it to kick in on most models.

Some bikes will have some sort of quick start override. But why all the complication, having more things to break down, when the solution it so simple and time tested?

Australia should have the guts to break ranks with Europe on this.

if they don’t, and Pedelec becomes the rule, people will find ways to modify their bikes to the throttle option, so infuriated will they be with Pedelec alone.

E bikes are going to be very big. Let’s get it right this time since we’ve waited so long for change anyway !

21 Mar 2010

The Sinking of the Adelaide

Posted by Mike Rubbo. No Comments

My bike blog has to give way this week to another urgent matter, the plans to sink a navy ship as a reef just off our beach. That’s Avoca Beach.

We were not consulted. We are horrified and we are fighting back. The sinking is just days away, March 27th. Yet still we think we can stop it, even though there are signs all over the Central Coast, announcing the “great day” and explaining which roads will be closed.

They expect 30,000 people to view the ship go down from the beaches and cliffs. How disappointed some will be!

Visit the web site for more info. http://noship.com.au/

I’ve made several films about why we are opposed. Now, having been handed the most wonderful protest song by local folk singers, Nick and Liesl, I’ve made this music video, The Sinking of the Adelaide.

I’m putting the lyrics here because we hope that other singers will want to sing it, especially overseas.

Why? Well, if word gets to our embassies that this song telling how we are with this action, undermining all our environmental principles, then perhaps those in the far flung embassies who care about our foreign image, will send word back to Canberra, that this is not a good idea

The lyrics for The sinking of the Adelaide by Nick and Liesl.

Standing at Avoca,
Oh, what a beautiful place
The land has been scarred before
but the oceans remain unpaved.

Standing on the beach
watching the waves roll in
Will it ever be the same?
after the sinking of the Adelaide

Chorus.
Adelaide, in her ocean grave,
a shipwreck without a storm.
A sunken ship wont help us pay for,
the oceans we cant restore.

It’s just a drop in the ocean,
but a drop I don’t want to taste.
At what point do we ask ourselves,
should we treat our oceans this way?

It’s out of sight and out of mind,
‘cept for the divers and the fish they’ll find.
I guess the Government’s made up it’s mind,
but without choices we have no rights.

Chorus.

Is it worth the risk is it worth the fight.
(Liesl repeats) Is it with the risk, is it worth the fight?

I’m just not sure this is right.
(Liesl) I’m just not sure this is right.
You and me and mother nature’s plight.

There are questions unanswered,
and there are risks we can’t deny.

We can sit on the fence
with holes in our fancy pants
But this aint no summer romance,
there will be no second chance.

Chorus twice.

14 Mar 2010

Bike it or Not (How to cross bike)

Posted by Mike Rubbo. 11 Comments

Hi Folks, it’s been a long time since the last post. I’ve been totally consumed by helping to fight against the scuttling of the HMAS Adelaide off our lovely Avoca beach.

If that interests, you have a look at; The Graveyard of the Adelaide, on youtube and the two films which follow.

But now, I’ve found a moment to make the film I’ve had in head for so long, a film about a cyclist who crosses over, why rides different bikes for different hikes

Meet Jill Charlton and enjoy her company.

Jill is part of the revolution we need to have in Australia, to widen our cycling culture from the the present Sport/leisure one, to include serious utility cycling.

That means embracing the machines, the sit-up Amsterdam type bikes made for the job.

All the excuses as to why these marvelous machines are hardly seen here, are furphies. The European who ride these bikes so pervasively have hills in some parts, have daunting distances, and they have headwinds.

Nothing turns them off the best bike for the job of going A to B, the bike they’ve been riding for more than 60 years, unbroken, the sit-up.

Why the subtle exclusion of these bikes here, the put downs in bike shops? I’d hate to think it, but could it be economic?

As David Hembrow explained in Talking to David Hembrow, such bikes need little maintenance, last for 20 years and never go out of fashion.

They do have lots of accessories but these generally come with the bike in Europe, the lights, the rack, the chain guard, etc.

What the sit-ups don’t don’t need is special clothes. There is no need to Gear up Girl l with one of these.

In the film, Jill points to her padding, comfort built into her Lycra shorts. Well, why not have a comfy seat to begin with? Is that such a revolutionary idea?

As we readily admit in Bike it or Not, these bikes are slower. But is that a bad thing? Is it really good to rush around as if you were a car?

What about those slow moments all around the world, starting with leisurely meals in the Italian style?

There is a slow bike movement too, and it needs consideration here as we spin ourselves into early stress based graves.

By the way, thanks to Peninsula Pedallers for proposing that mine are the best bike advocacy films in Australia.

That’s encouraging, folks

27 Feb 2010

He’s going round the world

Posted by admin. 1 Comment

My apologies that this blog has been inactive recently. I've been busy on other things, making movies for the village in which I live, Avoca Beach

Now I’ve been jolted back into bike action by the fact that Guim is about to arrive. Guim Valls Teruel is a Spaniard in his 30’s who I first heard about about 9 months ago.

Guim was working in Beijing and surrounded by Electric bikes, there are approx 60 million in China, he decided to ride a very robust model around the world.

His idea was to bring attention to this very clean and practical form of transport.

Indeed, E bikes make it possible for people in hilly areas and those who don’t have the youth or strength for normal bike, to get back to cycling.

That’s my case. I live in a very hilly area and have an electric bike, indeed several, and so I was immediately interested.

If you’ve come here before, you’ll also have seen Dr. Ian Charlton on his E bike, and soon you’ll see his wife, Gill Charlton, on hers.

As Guim struggled to get sponsorship, I even threw in a few bucks to get him on the road, hoping to be able to film him at some point.

He’s been keeping me posted and I’ve also visited his web site from time to time.

So, now I find out he’s in New Zealand , been having a great time, and is about to fly to Brisbane. Here, he’s talking to Auckland TV.

Do leave him a comment on his blog if you find this trip intriguing

/>

EBWT in TV3 NZ (interview) from Electric Bicycle World Tour on Vimeo.

Guim will be looking for press coverage both in Brisbane, and as he rides down our coast towards Sydney.

In Brissie, I’ve put him in touch with another doctor friend who rides an E bike, Paul Martin, in the hopes he’ll be able to help Guim.

As he gets down our way, I hope to be able to ride with Guim for a bit and do that filming.

Meanwhile, some other exciting things have been happening. I’ve been very pleased with the response to the film I made about Melbourne councillor, Jackie Fristacky.

Using that as a calling card, I have been approaching councils in the Sydney area, hoping to find one which would be a good film subject.

It seems like I may have found one that will be more than just a movie topic.

I don’t want to say which council it is just yet, but I’ve pitched to the Deputy Mayor of this particular council the idea of a new sort of campaign for utility cycling in his area.

I put it this way. The normal planning emphasis these days is on infrastructure, building more bike ways of various sorts , plus bike parking etc. All well and good.

But really, all of this has little point unless people do fervently want to ride bikes as transport.

If few do, it’s like you are building a sporting venue for a game few want to actually play.

So, at the same time as you plan those bike-ways, let’s create an image of utility cycling which is really friendly, inviting and fashionable,

FIF for short.

That we do by running a campaign for a different way to ride , dramatically different to the speeding cyclist in Lycra on his carbon fibre machine, which is such a common sight on two wheels these days.

The Tony Abbott look you could call it.

Let’s mount a campaign for the sit-up bike, the Amsterdam style bike, knowing that it’s a posture which is far more comfortable, and which flies a flag for a new way ride.

It’s an image which says, forget the speed, the special gear, you don’t need them. Just hop on a bike like this and go, go to the shops to work to visit someone, whatever!

Each such rider we get going, will attract others. So, our slogan will be, Come ride with me

I loved this clever promotion the Hungarians have done for such cycling.

It’s clever though the hero bike (that a movie term of the key prop) is not a sit up. As with so much that’s great, I found this on Copenhagenize.com.

Why do I like this ckip winning people to cycling is very much about status, cycling seeming cool.

At the moment sports cycling is super cool for a certain group whilst leaving most of us, cold

Now, I know that’s not fair which is why I need to hurry up and cut the material I’ve shot with Gill Charlton. She proves it’s not, either-or.

In the weekends, Gill dons her Lycra and gets on her carbon fibre bike, loving the speed.

Weekdays, she’s on a sit up bike and to see her riding by, you’d never know it was the same person.

Here’s Gill at speed

and with her weekday bike behind her.

To see her on the latter, you’ll have to wait for the movie, Gill changes Stripes . I’ll call it.

So to finish up, not only am I suggesting to this council a campaign based on a type of bike, but also that the emphasis be put, not so much on commuting, but on neighborhood riding.

The area I’m looking at is quite flat, and has many small shopping centres, both of which make perfect for local bike use.

If we can boost the idea of getting around locally on one of these comfy bikes, it might be a bit of a breakthrough.

This is friend Bruce Moir, seen here with me on a recent ride around Sydney.

Bruce drives a new VW , a very sophisticated little car which tells him the amount of diesel he’s using at any given moment.

Knowing the great mileage the car gets on trips, Bruce was horrified to find that on local drives to the shops, this fuel economy was cut by half.

It’s the stop and go driving on short trips, which is the worst for both consumption and green house gas emissions

So, if we can get people using bikes for short local trips, we do a great thing both for our wallets and the environment.

That’s the campaign I hope to part of as an ideas man and diarist with a camera.

In the meantime, I eagerly wait the arrival of of Guim

And if you have any interest in what I’ve been doing for Avoca Village, film-wise, here are the recent efforts. Firstly, The Graveyard of the Adelaide,

And then, The Lizard Diaries

I could not resist opening up this post to communicate the excitement which is being felt in Montreal these days. Here’s an extract from the Montreal paper, The Gazette.

If only we could read this story about Sydney, eh?

By MIchelle Lalonde, The Gazette

If you are a Montrealer who cares about the environment, you should have been dancing in the streets last week. The Agence métropolitaine du transport finally released the results of its latest Origin- Destination survey, and the news was very good, indeed.

The survey, done every five years by the transit authority, gives a snapshot (taken in 2008 this time) of how people in the greater Montreal region get from place to place. For those of us concerned about climate change, air quality, public health and the livability of this city, the news was fantastic.

For the first time in 40 years, car use was actually down! While the population of the metropolis grew by five per cent between 2003 and 2008, car use dropped by one per cent across the region, which includes Laval and the South Shore. On the island of Montreal itself, car trips were down six per cent. This may not sound like a huge drop, but it is hugely significant. It shows there is hope for this city to buck the North American trend of relentless, ever-increasing car and truck traffic.

Second, public transit use jumped an impressive 15 per cent during that five-year period. And with new transit projects on the horizon, like the east-end commuter train just approved by Quebec’s Environment Department, we can expect more people to trade that stressful morning traffic jam for a window seat and a good newspaper on the train.

But here’s the stat that really gets my heart pounding: a whopping 11-per-cent increase in the number of Montrealers commuting by bicycle or on foot.

I suspect the opening of the de Maisonneuve Blvd. bike path in the fall of 2007 had a lot to do with the cycling increase. Painted bike lanes throughout the central boroughs has also made cycling safer and more inviting, since most car drivers do respect these lanes. The impact of Bixi, the city’s short-term bike-rental service, launched in the spring of 2009, has not even been tallied yet, but it’s clear Bixi is getting more Montrealers out of their cars.

Montreal has reduced speed limits on city streets, widened some sidewalks and reduced the width of certain intersections, all of which help make the city safer for pedestrians.

These are the kinds of progressive changes Montreal needs to keep the trend moving in the right direction. But instead of resting on our laurels, now is the time for Montrealers to push harder than ever for changes that make it safe and convenient for residents to walk, cycle or take public transit.

4 Feb 2010

Melbourne’s Bixi Mystery.

Posted by Mike Rubbo. 15 Comments

A Newspaper in Montreal, The Gazette, was yesterday (Feb.4th) shouting the good news. Aussies Joining Bixi Empire

The Public Bike System Company, PBSC, the company behind Bixi, has signed two new contracts – one with Minneapolis to supply 1000 Bixi bikes, and another with Melbourne for 610 Bixis.

Bixis are the self help rental bikes which are such a success, both in their hometown, Montreal, and now, it seems, elsewhere.

Indeed, TIME named the bike one of the world’s ten best inventions for 2008, and that was before the Bixi took Montreal by storm last northern summer.

Above, you see some happy Montreal riders, city councillors, I suspect, and below, in yellow green, is the Minneapolis Bixi, coming soon.

That Australia would get a bike share scheme in Melbourne, and that the bike would be the sit -up Bixis, has been known for some time.

But from Montreal and it’s Mayor Gerald Tremblay, come some interesting facts.

The 610 bikes on Melbourne streets will be dispensed from 52 stations which will offer 1000 docking bays, almost twice as many bays as bikes. I guess these extra bays are for expansion, and also to make it easier to find a slot to leave the Bixi when you are done with it.

According to the Montreal Mayor, the bikes are to be on Melb. streets by May this year. Yet a news release by Bicycle Victoria on Jan 13th 2010, put the release date as the middle of next year, 2011.

That’s Mystery number one.

What does seem sure is that the Bixi is becoming the bike of choice for these bike share schemes, and a fantastic earner one imagines for Quebec.

These guys from Rio Tinto/Alcan sure look happy now that they’ve sold 6000 Bixis to London, 2000 to Boston, and now have these Minneapolis and Melbourne sales in hand. Bixi is on a two wheel roll!

It’s sad, if we had developed a utility bike culture in Australia, maybe this success might have come to us, innovative as we are.

But we’ve had no eyes for bikes as transport for many years now. Australia has been obsessed with the racing side of cycling, with bikes as ultra light sports machines, everything the Bixi is not, as you see here.

The Bixi designers traveled the world, and in 18 months built from scratch a fourth generation system, robust and flexible.

Hitherto the Velibs of Paris, some 25,000 of them have held the spotlight, bikes which I still find more elegant than the Bixi.

But whereas the Velibs have been vandalized in huge numbers, the Bixis have not. Is this because the Bixis are stronger, more robust?

Like the Velibs, the Bixi is the classic sit-up bike with basket, enclosed chain, 7 enclosed gears. They sit you so high that you see better and can be seen better.

Bixis create a different dialogue with other traffic. They don’t evoke the road rage, now so commonly vented on the sports cyclist here.
…………..
……………
……………

An inbuilt GPS system allows Bixi Central to track each bike and even lock the brakes if the renter is not returning it at the end of the paid for period. Whether this is true or not is uncertain, something Bixi may not want to advertise.

Canada’s CBC News quoted a student who worked on the bikes, as saying the bikes had GPS chips.

The dispensing stations are also very sophisticated in that they can be quickly set up anywhere with no need for excavations or cabling required for the Velibs. They are solar powered and all data transmission to PBSC is wireless.

Bixis are extremely user friendly. You either take out an annual membership for $78 and use a key to unlock a bike in which case the bike is free for you all day, or you rent it via a credit card which, with a swipe, unlocks the bike to you.

In this case, the first half hour is free and a modest charge builds incrementally after that, up to $5 of the day.

My understanding is that most of the million rentals Bixi did last summer season in Montreal (they took them off the streets during the winter ) were free rides, folks doing half hour dashes around the city.

When PBSC initially rolled out 3000 bikes, the thinking was that mainly tourists would use them, but so popular were they with the locals, that they soon added another 2000 bikes as the season progressed.

Locals took them at their name. Bixi is an abbreviation of bike-Taxi, and so Montrealers used them as personal taxis. What Montreal taxi drivers thought of this, I don’t know.

The Second mystery is really more of a question. Can these Bixis work in Melbourne where the situation will be utterly different?

In Melbourne, some way has to be found to dispense not just a bike, but the compulsory helmet as well .

As an expert explains in my film; Bike Share and helmets don’t Mix? no one has succeeded, as yet, in setting up bike share where there is compulsory helmets.

This is because there is no known way to dispense a sterilized and inspected helmet along with each bike, unless done by hand.

But having staff defeats the ease and economy of the Bixi system, and is way outside the what must be a fragile business model.

The Bike Victoria news release speaks of; innovative folding helmets and vending machines.

As I found out with my film, searching for solution, they are not thinking to recycle helmets as helmets. Helmets might be be broken down and made anew, but not passed from rider to rider.

This leads me to ask;
1. How may riders will be ready to buy a helmet, esp. for a short ride, if they are $15 , as was suggested to me as the target price

2. How accessible will the on-sale helmets be? Will there be a dispensing machine at each docking station, or will, as was also suggested to me, they’ll be sold through 7/11s and McDonalds?

3. If so, how far will one have to push the bike to get a helmet, and what does that do to the free half hour ride one wanted?

4. What will you do with the helmet when done? Is the rider, (bike riders tend to be Green,) going to like the idea of the energy needed to handle and re make the helmets ?

5. How will visitors from countries which do allow choice on helmets, the majority, going to react?

Nothing is forcing them to rent a bike. This helmet business, which may well seem silly to them, and could easily be the deciding factor against using a bike.

This will be especially true if visitors feel that our helmet laws, out of step with the rest of the world, are not cycle friendly, which, sad to say, is true since they lower cycle numbers.

Then, there is the question of the number of bikes on the streets. It may be that the 600 planned for Melbourne are a pilot project. But you can’t run a pilot project without a plane which flies.

Unless there are enough bikes for the scheme to work in a near optimum way, the scheme can’t prove itself.

One can imagine 600 bikes meeting tourist needs, folks with no urgent agendas to follow . Here’s my friend, James, who writes that great blog The Urban Country being a tourist on a Montreal Bixi last summer.

But the local user has different needs. Following the Taxi analogy, these users need bikes fast and reliably, to get to a meeting or a maybe lecture at Uni.

The Bixis have to be available in such numbers that one can find one almost all the time. In Montreal, the stations are almost always in line of sight.

Secondly, the renter needs to be able to get rid of the bike equally fast when he/she gets to his appointment or to class.

Imagine in Melbourne with only 50 docking stations, the dramas which might arise.

You’ve nabbed a bike for what you planned as a half hour ride to an urgent appointment, and now you cant get rid of it. There’s no docking station where you need to leave it, or they are all full.

What do you do? The bike have no independent lock. So, either you carry your own lock, locking it to some post till after class, later paying the extra rental, or you carry the bike into your meeting and also pay later.

That only has to happen once for you revert to more reliable transport like your own bike, taxi, or public transport.

The helmet, that’s another problem. If you do find Bixis readily available and convenient, then you might carry a helmet with you.

But if there are any doubts, you wont, and to experiment with the system, you are going to have to buy a helmet and lug it around afterwards

Just as nature abhors the vacuum, nature also abhors unnecessary complications, which is why I can’t see this scheme working with the hassle of the helmet.

Vancouver was supposed to have bike share in time for the Winter Olympics. No bike share has appeared and the word is that helmets, they also make them compulsory, were the problem.

Tel Aviv is ready to bite the Bullet, I’m told. They brought in compulsory helmets quite recently but now, with 1500 bikes ready for the streets, and no helmet solution, the Israelis are thinking of rescinding their new law.

Moreover, as more and more cities prove that you can run bike share schemes without a nasty increase in head injuries, our insistence that we are somehow dumber, our heads more fragile than anyone else, is going to seem more and more silly.

I’ve suggested a workable compromise to what promises to tie bike share in knots.

Namely that all sit-up bike riders be allowed to exercise choice as to wear helmets or not. the choice which they have almost everywhere else, one might add.

This frees schemes like Bixi, which are all sit-up, to take hold to expand and thrive, and at the same time it favors the sort of bike most likely to grow utility cycling in this country, the stately Sit-up


……………
The sit-up is a very different bike . Look at this Peugeot beauty. We see bikes everyday but few with the elegance, the grace, of this bike .

Is it not obvious that such bikes could be in another category as they arrange their riders in postures never seen on Australian bikes?
………..

Are you desperate to see a helmet on this rider? I think not.

Do not our streets deserve to be so adorned? and for the pedestrian, what would the impact be to meet such bicycle beauty at the traffic lights?

“I’d like to be doing that!” many would think, is my guess.

Surely this bike and rider from Copenhagen Cycle chic riding a Velorbis, I suspect, that’s a famous Danish Sit-up Bike, is more inviting to the non rider than our women cyclists below.

These riders, pushing hard in their lycra, are no doubt fit and happy, but speak from a world apart.

They don’t help us get the average young woman out of her Getz and onto a bike for those many short trips she makes

And the Hon. Tony Abbott, he sets a good example, but does not attract the non rider. Wouldn’t you agree Mr Abbott?

A helmet exemption for sit up riders could have far ranging effects, all good, I suggest. At the moment we have in Australia what amounts to a mono cycle culture. .

We are apparently third in the world in sports cycling, the mono culture, but in utility cycling, the orphan culture, we are near last.

Here’s the cover of Australian Cyclist, the dominant image the dominant message.

Our tiny utility bike world needs to be nurtured, as my suggestion would do, given special treatment to help it grow by favoring the Sit -Up

In this article in the Melb. Age Dr.Garry Glazebrook is reported as suggesting that those who ride on green-ways be exempted from helmet use.

But such bike paths are rare. Moreover, what do you do when you come to the end of a green-way and have to join the normal road system, pull out the helmet you’re thus forced to lug around? It would be a strange, on and off situation, I fear

With these suggestions to enhance utility cycling, the good thing is that it does not have to be; an either or when it comes to sit up and road bikes

As Dr. Ian Charlton explains in the second half of his video, he loves his racing bike for weekend rides, but come Monday morning, he’s doing his doctors rounds on a sit up.

Related to that, such a helmet compromise could seed the emergence of a powerful new lobby, pushing for bike-ways like the super path in Brisbane.

These have separated paths been proven time and again to be the best way to make people, feel safe on bikes. With Sit -ups, helmet free, a new lobby group can form, to push for such paths more urgently.

Bicycle Victoria and Bicycle NSW have been a doing a heroic job in promoting cycle paths of various sorts, but they need help from a new public on bikes, such as favoring sit-ups could bring

I suspect that we lag with bike-ways because the sports cyclists, the dominant breed, don’t particularly want or need separate paths, clogged as are, with slower riders.

They are happy riding the roads, as they do now, going as always for their PB’s, their personal bests.

But the sit-up rider dreams of little else than a sweet separation from heavy traffic

With new sit-up lobbyists at work, our Governments will no longer be able to shove the responsibility for safety onto the heads of the riders, as they’ve done till now.

True cycle safety is under the wheels not on the head.

The  scheme in Minneapolis and St Paul, the twin cities, is set up by a non profit organization with the great name of Nice Ride Minnesota and is the first large public bike scheme in the US.>

The driving force is Bill Dossett, Executive director of Nice Ride Minnesota.

We wish them luck as we do Melbourne too of course

27 Jan 2010

Something brilliant and something(s) quirky.

Posted by Mike Rubbo. 3 Comments

This must be one of the longest clips I’ve even watched on Youtube. Yet I was enthralled by this man’s insight and wit.

Thanks so much to that great blog Auckland Cycle Chic for bringing it to my rapt attention.

Thanks too, to TED talks, for recruiting this man to their forum and posting the video

What is James Howard Kunstler on about? Does he speak about bikes? see for yourself.

If you insist on some biographical info before being willing to click the arrow, try this.

“James Howard Kunstler says he wrote The Geography of Nowhere, “Because I believe a lot of people share my feelings about the tragic landscape of highway strips, parking lots, housing tracts, mega-malls, junked cities, and ravaged countryside that makes up the everyday environment where most Americans live and work……….” (One adds, Australians and NewZealanders as well.)

Now for the Quirky! How about Bike lots in tubes?

Yes, the Japanese are quietly sinking tubes into their cityscapes which automatically store and retrieve hundreds of bikes.

I say, quietly, because the pile driving involved is cleverly shhhhed, apparently

Please note in passing, the type of bike being stored.

One might wonder whether, with a 17 second retrieval time , this sort of parking would work well when hundreds of cyclists all want to store or get back their bikes at the same time.

Now for the super quirky. A hill lift for cyclists. You’ll have to look closely to see how it works

Don’t forget to watch Jackie Fristacky’s film, Councillor on a Bike, right below. Also, check out Sydney Cyclist Forum for lots of interesting discussion threads. (link on side)

Indeed , I now have another council film in mind, thanks to the Forum . Keep you posted.

21 Jan 2010

Dear Wade Wallace……

Posted by Mike Rubbo. 6 Comments

Cycling tips

Dear, Wade, I found an interesting little essay (see below) on a US blog called; Utility cycling.

Its called; Thoughts on Re-Imaging the bicycle.

It raises some of the questions I’ve been asking myself and you, and so I’m including it in this letter to you.

Before that, a note to the reader as to why I write to Wade Wallace .

What’s especially significant about Wade’s blog is that he has broken through to the Mainstream press.

His blog is now carried by our major newspaper chain, the Fairfax papers. Thus Cycling tips becomes the blog face of cycling to a much larger public.

A visit to Cycling tips will show its dominated by the sports aspect of cycling. Lycra is everywhere.

I wrote to Wade saying that his masthead also promises that he’s interested in bikes as transport, and that’s not the Lycra look.

Was he prepared to do stories of the sort that would appeal to those of us who just want a use a bike to get around, and in our regular clothes?

We’re not riding fast bikes, most of us. Just practical bikes, some of them sit-ups like they use all over Europe

Wade wrote back very candidly, and has given me permission to quote him.

Dear Mike, Thanks for taking the time to explain all this to me. I understand where you’re coming from and can appreciate your passion.

I have to be cognizant of my readership however. I did a reader survey last year where thousands of people responded. I have a very good idea of why these people come to my site. That reason is escapism and to learn more about cycling (in particular bike racing).

If I were to stray away from that, I would lose readers ….. I’m not here to be everything to everybody. I’ve chosen a particular niche who I share a passion with. There are many different types of cyclists out there. I cannot cater to them all.

Wade.

We’ve exchanged a few more letters since. I understand his caution but what this means that one sort of bike culture, the sport and racing culture, is getting all the attention.

As long as this is true, I suspect we’ll never use bikes for transport to anything like the degree they do in Europe.

This means we”ll keep missing out on all the advantages they bring, unclogged cities, lower emissions, and better health for the average Australian.

I’m sure you know that we are now the most obese nation on earth. Did you also know we spend 58 billion a year, much of it public money, dealing with the consequences?

It’s very serious, Wade, this situation we are in, and the future we face as a consequence.

The humble bike can be part of the solution, and that has to be a fair topic on blogs representing cycling like yours.

Yours is the only one going into the MSM , isn’t it? .

Your readers are having a great time racing around in Lycra, and no one would deny them that. They are not obese. They are not a drain on the health budget, and they are having a great time.

But they shouldn’t be the only game, or even the main game, in town. Riders here should encouraged to look like these riders in Amsterdam as well.

It’s not just me, Melanie Meyers in the US, writing in the blog, Utility cycling, is saying similar things> Here’s Melanie.

Thoughts on Re-Imaging the Bicycle
Posted on 02. Nov, 2009 by Melanie Meyers

I have just been catching up on many of the posts recently about Mikael Colville-Andersen’s lecture tour through the United States.

Colville-Andersen’s blog Copanhagenize.com is a must-read (and oftentimes, view, as there are numerous videos, as well) for sage advice and insight into what makes cycling possible in Copenhagen and around the world.

Although I have not had the opportunity to attend one of Colville-Andersen’s lectures, reviewing a handful of posts from those who did – most notably from Bike Portland and Cyclelicios.us, who had some great coverage – has inspired me to respond.

One of the most resounding messages from the lectures is that in order for cycling to be more appealing to the masses in the United States, it needs to be “re-branded” so that there is less emphasis on the subcultures of cycling.

Cycling subcultures are negative, it has been argued, as they alienate cyclists from “regular citizens” and make cyclists seem like “the other”. Of course, Colville-Andersen has covered numerous other issues in his lectures, but it is this particular issue to which I would like to respond today.

I agree with Colville-Andersen’s criticism of branding and marketing of cycling (especially in the U.S.) as focusing too much on what I would refer to as sport cycling.

As Colville-Andersen puts it, this kind of marketing makes cycling seem “dangerous and sweaty” and does undoubtedly limit the potential for non-cyclists to feel a connection to or need for the bicycle.

In Copenhagen, he points out, people ride bicycles because they are the easiest and most efficient way to get from point A to point B and not necessarily because bicycles are “cool”.

At the same time, I feel a need to quickly defend sport and recreation forms of cycling, because they are different from what I consider to be utility cycling.

I race bikes; I take it seriously; I work really hard; and I want equipment that caters to my sport (yes, that includes lycra). In this sense, I am no different from a football player, a baseball player, or any other athlete who uses specialized equipment.

For sport cyclists, the bicycle is essential to the sport. The bicycle is to a sport cyclist what a football is to a football team. Take away the football, and there is no football game. Take away the bicycle, and there is no bicycle race.

However, it’s really not so simple. The bicycle industry in the U.S. (And in Australia too. Ed.) has focused primarily on sport and recreational cycling for many years, and this is quite clear when a “regular citizen” walks into a bike shop and is overwhelmed by strange materials, high price tags, and uncomfortable looking equipment.

This is problematic, as it does alienate and intimidate people who do not need or want this kind of equipment.

It can be difficult for someone who wants a transportation bicycle (a tool for getting around) that suits his or her needs when bike shops are brimming over with high-tech, expensive equipment.

I completely agree that the bicycle needs to be re-branded in order to appeal to the average person. However, this raises the question of who is to do the re-branding?

The bicycle industry obviously, but who else? The bicycle industry has already dug itself into a sport and recreation cycling hole of sorts, so in order to actually have an impact, the re branding is going to need to be more extensive.

The biggest issue that I see here is the bicycle itself. The bicycle is multi-functional and multi-faceted. This is good and bad. According to Colville-Andersen, for many cyclists in Copenhagen, the bicycle is like a vacuum cleaner.

It’s a tool, and not too many people get very excited about their vacuums. For others, the bicycle is a piece of sporting equipment, for yet others it is a symbol of resistance and counter-culture.

Unfortunately, for the masses, the bicycle appears to be largely ignored or even worse, disliked.

So what is to be done? Here we have an object – the bicycle – that has many different personalities and uses depending on who is using it and in what context.

Colville-Andersen is right, subcultures in cycling are indeed problematic, as they inherently leave behind many, while only bringing along a few.

However, I don’t think subcultures in cycling are entirely bad either, as they also allow people to build community among like-minded individuals, which can make cycling more fun.

Given that the bicycle and cycling can be so diverse, this is not necessarily wrong or bad.

Nonetheless, the question remains, how do we make cycling more appealing to the masses? Clearly, focusing on sport and recreation cycling equipment is not an appropriate way to appeal to the masses.

But is re branding the bicycle the right strategy, and if it is, how could it be approached? Who should help with such a the rebranding – or re imagining?

The power of the popular imagination is incredibly strong. To that end, I think it is really important to define utility cycling in order to efficiently impress and speak to the popular imagination in a clear and concise way.

There needs to be coherence and consistency to the concept of utility cycling in order to make it seem manageable, appealing, easy, and natural.

Why not make cycling seem as simple and necessary as vacuuming? Vacuums clean your carpet, but what do bicycles do for you?

As always, I welcome your thoughts. By Melanie Meyers originally in Community building

Do visit the original post to see the interesting comments it provoked

I left my own comment. I suggested that re branding the utility bike can be done by upping the status of the Sit-up bike.

These stately machines, preferred all over Europe for just getting around, are not only safer and more comfortable, but they fly the flag we need.

The say; “This sort of cycling is different. This is for you, the no racer.”

I also pointed out that the most likely way for the stately bike, now seen as being very slow and low status, to gain respect, is the coming of Bike Share.

The Velibs in Paris, the Bixis in Montreal and soon, London.

These bikes are invariably sit-up, and as riders and, as non riders get used to them, they will change the image of the sit up bike.

David Hembrow explains their appeal

and Dr. Ian Charlton, who rides both sit-up bikes and racing bikes, suggest they compliment each other

15 Jan 2010

Jackie Fristacky’s excellent day on wheels

Posted by Mike Rubbo. 13 Comments

Cycling in Australia

This is the story of the day I spent following ( on a bike) a very inspiring politician around the streets of Yarra city, which is part of Melbourne.

Jackie has been part of a push which has seen Yarra city climb to the highest rate of bike commuting of anywhere in Australia.

Jackie Fristacky’s story might look like just another movie on YouTube. But actually it’s a very special tool for change, at least potentially.

What you can do, if you like it, is to find out who is sympathetic to bikes as transport on your own local council, and then send that person this video.

If you get a response, follow it up. See if they’d like to be in contact with Jackie Fristacky and Yarra council to find out more.

We can grow bike use together in ways like this. It’s fun.

Just like it’s fun riding a bike as transport, so much fun it should be illegal.

These are not my councillors, not yours either, but they do look receptive, don’t they?

You might be surprised to find your timing is spot on when it comes to your council and bikes. The world is changing and the only way to know, is to pay a visit.

So, here’s the secret weapon, the Fristacky file.

Let me know how you go with Jackie’s story.

People might want to know more as to why Yarra city council is doing so well. Jackie Fristacky has sent myself and David Hembrow, some more detail.

She says; There are a range of reasons why Yarra has a high cycling mode share.

1, Location close to key destinations such as CBD (1-2kms away to 5kms away at the extreme), employment and local activity centres;

2. Yarra being 19 sq kms, and only a few kms. from CBD, so distances all easily cyclable;

3 Relatively flat terrain;

4. Hoddle grid street pattern (rectangular blocks) makes cycling easy;

5. High youth population, including students, given proximity to many tertiary educational institutions (University of Melbourne, RMIT, Australian Catholic University, and city campuses of Monash University, Vitoria University and others);

6 Demographic is diverse with high proportion of professionals (higher incomes), and students and public housing (low incomes); both demographics cycle;

7. cycling as an egalitarian and independent mode, suits the Yarra demographic;

8. Traffic Congestion is common. So it is far more effective to cycle – being faster and door to door;

9. 20% of households do not have a car, compared with Melbourne average of 10%;

10. 73,000 residents; and 8,700 businesses in Yarra, employing some 60,000 people. Yarra is the largest source of employment outside the CBD.

11. Some large businesses, like the CUB, have large secure bike cages for staff. Many employers are starting to encourage their staff to cycle to work with good parking and other facilities.

Under the State planning scheme, these have become mandatory for larger new developments, but this is effecting existing businesses too.

At meetings with planners, we take every opportunity to point out that more bikes are sold than cars, especially in Yarra, so where are residents/workers going to put their bikes?

We say that if they don’t want them in corridors and on balconies where they can cause trip hazards and WorkCare claims, then they need to plan better storage places;

13. Yarra inherited a good cycle path to the CBD (Canning Street) but this has been supplemented by bike paths on virtually all roads in Yarra due to policy change directing this;

13. Role models of Mayor and councillors on bikes, and senior staff including Directors on bikes;

14. PR with press features on cycling and facilities;

15. Many local workers like to attend a bar or the like after work and having a car hampers them with restricted parking

Cr Jackie M Fristacky
Councillor for Nicholls Ward, City of Yarra
jackie.fristacky@yarracity.vic.gov.au
Phone: 0412 597 794

And here’s a companion story, another busy professional who, not only uses a bike on the job but, like Jackie, has interesting ideas about how bikes can make our lives better.

This is Ian Charlton, The Doctor on a Bike. Seeing patients, Ian prefers to prescribe a bike than a pill.

Indeed, Ian believes that if we were to increase our exercise through cycling and walking, we could get off those lifestyle pills so many us now take.

He’s got me off. A year ago I was taking six pills. Now, I take one.

P.S The three men in suits are actually Montreal council people riding the new Bixi bikes around that city. Montreal is a case of city council making a huge difference in the cycling culture of a city.